Again, the drama around pivotal line calls broke out, with Coco Gauff being the victim this time. During her French Open semifinal match against Iga Swatek, the rising American star briefly spoke with the chair umpire.
Everything began when Swiatek struck her serve, which was called out but overturned. The ball-hitting Gauff claimed that she only did so after the line call was made. This turned out to be a pivotal moment in her downfall.
Following his elimination by American sensation Iga Swiatek in the French Open semifinals, the player addressed a number of topics in the post-match press conference, one of which was the employment of hawkeye. She instantly said yes when the reporter inquired about if using technology or a review mechanism would benefit the players as well as the chair umpire.
She asserted that tennis is the only activity played that does not use a video assistant referee system. She continued, saying that it seemed almost absurd that tennis did not provide a fair opportunity to review the foul or provide any clarification to the decision, in contrast to other sports.
As a result, Coco Gauff expressed her viewpoint and proposed that tennis currently need the use of a Video Assistant Referee (VAR) or something comparable. In addition to ensuring justice, it would provide the players a voice to voice their grievances in the event that they believe the call went against them. To elaborate on her remarks, she said that it hurts a lot when players check online to see if the chair umpire’s call was incorrect.
Coco Gauff proposed that when players view the videos online and identify incorrect calls, they should feel guilty.
She went on to say later in the interview that the players feel terrible when they go online. additionally
Leave a Reply