![Chicago_Cubs_logo.svg](https://i0.wp.com/sportfulltime.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Chicago_Cubs_logo.svg_-5.png?resize=678%2C381&ssl=1)
Entering Spring Training, the Chicago Cubs offence isn’t good enough to compete. The front office’s acquisitions of Shota Imanaga and Hector Neris were noteworthy, but their attacking output has decreased.
Cody Bellinger hasn’t made a decision on his team for the upcoming season, but Jeimer Candelario has signed with the Cincinnati Reds.
Bellinger’s absence would make the offence appear even more worrisome. For the Cubs, Matt Chapman has been linked to rumours, but given Bellinger’s performance from the previous campaign, he is a need.
It appears like a new contract with Chicago is what’s expected. As the two try to work out a contract, it remains to be seen if that actually happens or not.
It’s official, according to Jon Morosi of MLB.com, who stated that a reunion between Bellinger and the Cubs would be the best fit.
It’s official, according to Jon Morosi of MLB.com, who stated that a reunion between Bellinger and the Cubs would be the best fit.
“A reunion between Bellinger and the North Siders seems like the best fit, in my opinion. Bellinger, who struggled greatly towards the conclusion of his Dodger career, found a home in Chicago. The Cubs have versatility at his two positions, first base and centre field.
Following his 2019 MVP victory, left-handed player Bellinger has had some setbacks.
After slashing.307/.356/.525 with 26 home runs in the previous season in Chicago, he was able to turn his career around. Baseball hadn’t seen a Bellinger like that since his MVP season, but that was the Bellinger of 2023.
It is highly probable that both sides will come to an understanding because there is an obvious need for a batter with strong production potential.
Given their offence, the Cubs need him more than he does, which may contribute to the lack of a trade thus far.
This time, Scott Boras won’t back down from his strategy of holding out until his team gets the deal he wants.
Leave a Reply